CMPA 3301 | Project Management Analytics
A summary of performance for Discussion 04. This module focused on identifying risks in Project 01 and applying the TAME framework from Chapter 4 of the course text.
16.8
Strong Pass
15
20/20 Achievement
46
Students Engaged
96%
Active Cohort
Actual Risk = I × P
Impact (1-5)
How much does this hurt the project?
Probability (1-5)
How likely is it to happen?
Note: A score of 12 or above requires an active strategy. Scores of 1-11 are typically "monitored" or "accepted."
Transfer
Pass the risk to someone else (e.g. Insurance).
Accept
Live with it if the cost of fixing it is too high.
Mitigate
Reduce the Impact or Probability (e.g. Backups).
Eliminate
Change the project so the risk doesn't exist.
Scores were categorized into four tiers based on technical accuracy and engagement.
Analyzing why 17 was the most common score this week.
The cohort demonstrated high professional maturity in identifying environmental risks (weather, outages) alongside technical risks (CSS selectors, malformed tags).
Most of you correctly applied the numerical threshold (12+) to trigger a TAME strategy. This demonstrates that you are beginning to think like "Unofficial Project Managers" who quantify their obstacles before attempting to solve them.
The primary cause for point deductions this week was missing the mandatory APA style citation for the textbook.